Comments on: Two Angels Petite Sirah 2006 http://www.vinegeek.com/2010/02/two-angels-petite-sirah-2006/ wine is interesting. Fri, 13 Aug 2010 01:47:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Jim/VINEgeek http://www.vinegeek.com/2010/02/two-angels-petite-sirah-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-508 Jim/VINEgeek Sun, 28 Feb 2010 03:56:30 +0000 http://www.vinegeek.com/?p=1711#comment-508 Brew - The flavor profile wasn't bad for me, but it didn't make enough of an impact. Glad you liked it though. Always appreciate getting comments from others who've tasted the wine. Thanks. Brew – The flavor profile wasn’t bad for me, but it didn’t make enough of an impact. Glad you liked it though. Always appreciate getting comments from others who’ve tasted the wine. Thanks.

]]> By: BreworFerment http://www.vinegeek.com/2010/02/two-angels-petite-sirah-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-503 BreworFerment Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:30:40 +0000 http://www.vinegeek.com/?p=1711#comment-503 I liked this one. Full mouthfeel, a little too much blueberry but I'm not THAT picky. Your right though it was not as powerful as a typical petite sirah I liked this one. Full mouthfeel, a little too much blueberry but I’m not THAT picky. Your right though it was not as powerful as a typical petite sirah

]]> By: Jim/VINEgeek http://www.vinegeek.com/2010/02/two-angels-petite-sirah-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-469 Jim/VINEgeek Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:00:34 +0000 http://www.vinegeek.com/?p=1711#comment-469 Let's hope free association never takes a turn in that direction! Let’s hope free association never takes a turn in that direction!

]]> By: @nectarwine http://www.vinegeek.com/2010/02/two-angels-petite-sirah-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-468 @nectarwine Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:50:39 +0000 http://www.vinegeek.com/?p=1711#comment-468 Farrah, duh. I'm glad you didn't do free association pic for 'green woody'. Cheers! Farrah, duh.

I’m glad you didn’t do free association pic for ‘green woody’.

Cheers!

]]>